Brothel Customer Can’t Be Prosecuted Under Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act: HC
The court said brothel customers cannot be prosecuted under four ITPA sections because paying for personal gratification is not commercial exploitation.
3 Articles
3 Articles
Brothel customer can’t be prosecuted under Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act: HC
The applicant, one of the persons charge-sheeted, approached the high court under Section 482 of the CrPC for quashing the proceedings, the charge sheet and the summoning order
Brothel customers can't be prosecuted under ITPA: HC
The Allahabad High Court has ruled that a customer visiting a brothel for personal gratification cannot be prosecuted under Sections 3, 4, 5, and 7 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956. The court clarified that paying for personal lust does not constitute "procurement for the purpose of prostitution," which implies commercial exploitation. This decision led to the quashing of charges against a man apprehended in a Ghaziabad raid.
In a significant judgment, the Allahabad High Court has clarified that a person visiting a brothel as a customer cannot be prosecuted under sections 3, 4, 5 and 7 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956. Justice Dr.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 50% of the sources are Center, 50% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium








