YPF Investors Ask U.S. Supreme Court to Revive $16.1 Bln Judgment Against Argentina
The investors say the ruling undermines foreign investment and conflicts with Supreme Court precedent.
- On Wednesday, investment firms Petersen Energia and Eton Park petitioned the United States Supreme Court to reinstate a $16.1 billion judgment against Argentina in the long-running YPF litigation.
- The dispute centers on Argentina's 2012 nationalization of YPF, where the country allegedly violated bylaws by failing to launch a mandatory tender offer after seizing a 51% stake from Repsol.
- Seeking to overturn a March decision by the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, investors argued the ruling was "egregiously wrong, wholly unprecedented, and extremely consequential."
- President Javier Milei hailed the March ruling as a victory, while the Republic continues to defend its position against litigation funder Burford Capital.
- According to the petition, allowing Argentina to repudiate promises made to raise capital in United States markets will have "severe ramifications for foreign investment.
11 Articles
11 Articles
YPF investors ask U.S. Supreme Court to revive $16.1 billion judgment against Argentina
By Natalia Siniawski and Leila Miller Oct 1 (Reuters) - Investment firms Petersen Energia and Eton Park petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday to reinstate a $16.1 billion judgment against Argentina in the long-running YPF litigation. The pet...
YPF Investors Ask Supreme Court to Review Argentine Legal Win
Former investors in Argentine state oil company YPF SA have asked the US Supreme Court to review an “egregiously wrong” lower-court ruling that overturned a $16 billion judgment in their favor.
YPF investors ask US Supreme Court to review Argentine legal win
Former shareholders who claim they were harmed by the 2012 nationalisation of YPF ask US Supreme Court to review lower-court ruling on US$16-billion judgement in their favour. Leer más
The investment fund, which finances the companies Petersen and Eton Park, goes through the last judicial channel in the United States.This month it had already presented itself to the ICSID of the World Bank for the expropriation of the oil company.
Following Argentina’s favorable ruling, plaintiffs Petersen and Eton Park have until today to file their appeal, while maintaining an assault on the World Bank court
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 50% of the sources are Center, 50% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium















