‘Apartheid Country’: Far-Left Pundit Says All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be ‘Presumptively Unconstitutional’
- Elie Mystal argued that all laws passed before the 1965 Voting Rights Act should be deemed presumptively unconstitutional due to their historical context.
- Critics claim that Mystal's views oversimplify complex legal issues and ignore historical contributions to civil rights, arguing that his ideas could harm the left's interests.
- The discussion highlights ongoing debates about race, history, and legislation in America and questions the implications of Mystal's proposals.
12 Articles
12 Articles
Racist Lib Guest on 'The View' Unknowingly Pushes Repeal of Civil Rights Act of 1964, Sonny Hostin Nods Along
Ah, Elie Mystal. How we’ve missed you since the “vibe shift” voters in November delivered us — along with the shift at MSNBC that seems to be toward saner, if […] The post Watch: Racist Lib Guest on 'The View' Unknowingly Pushes Repeal of Civil Rights Act of 1964, Sonny Hostin Nods Along appeared first on The Western Journal.
‘Apartheid Country’: Far-Left Pundit Says All Laws Passed Before 1965 Should Be ‘Presumptively Unconstitutional’
The Nation's Elie Mystal told "The View" co-hosts on Tuesday that all laws passed before the 1965 Voting Rights Act should be deemed "unconstitutional."
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 100% of the sources lean Right
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage