Published • loading... • Updated
Why some HBCUs and female athletes fear being left behind in new era of college sports
HBCUs face financial strain and equity concerns after the $2.8B settlement permits athlete pay; over 300 schools opted in, forcing tough choices on sports programs and Title IX compliance.
- This year, HBCUs are weighing whether to opt into a $2.8 billion antitrust settlement that more than 300 schools agreed to, adding financial pressure amid athlete pay changes.
- Allowing colleges to pay athletes directly prompted many schools to join because they feared opting out would hurt recruiting, while HBCUs lack the $200 million operating budgets of Power Four schools.
- Opting in only for revenue sports, University of Maryland Eastern Shore plans to rely on guarantee games while smaller schools like Stephen F. Austin University and Prairie View A&M recently cut programs.
- A Title IX lawsuit by six female athletes temporarily blocked some cuts, as female athletes warn the settlement favors football and men’s basketball over non-revenue sports.
- With limited budgets, historically Black colleges and universities face systemic funding gaps as Morgan State University reported about $21.7 million in athletics revenue, far below Power Four schools' hundreds of millions, while no HBCU has a $200 million operating budget.
Insights by Ground AI
21 Articles
21 Articles
+20 Reposted by 20 other sources
Why some HBCUs and female athletes fear being left behind in new era of college sports
A $2.8 billion NCAA settlement will let schools pay athletes directly, ending the amateur model that defined college sports for over a century.
·United States
Read Full ArticleCoverage Details
Total News Sources21
Leaning Left3Leaning Right1Center13Last UpdatedBias Distribution76% Center
Bias Distribution
- 76% of the sources are Center
76% Center
L 18%
C 76%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium













