Federal Judge Says First Amendment Shields Private Possession of AI Child Abuse Images

Federal Judge Says First Amendment Shields Private Possession of AI Child Abuse Images

Related posts: Updates From Middle East A Deep Dive: Influencers and “Independent” Journalists on Both Sides Being Paid to Advance Political Talking Points Report: More Than Half of Children in South Sudan Are Subjected to Child Labour & Exploitation FBI Announces Arrest of 244 Sex Offenders in Texas, Rescues Over 100 Children

Why federal judge ruled First Amendment protects certain AI-generated child sex abuse material

Judge John Z. Lee said he was bound by precedent, citing two U.S. Supreme Court decisions from 1969 and 2002.

A man accused of possessing AI-generated CSAM had his charge tossed. Here's why.

Dr. Mary Anne Franks gets why people may be upset by a recent court ruling on possessing AI-generated child sexual abuse material.The decision, issued in late August by a federal appeals court panel, found that the First Amendment protects the possession of child sexual abuse material, or CSAM, in the home if it was created using artificial intelligence and does not depict an actual child."A lot of people have quite understandable intuitions abo…

Are AI Images Of Child Sex Abuse Protected By First Amendment? [Op-Ed]

An appeals court cited the First Amendment in dismissing the charges against a man accused of using AI to make child sex abuse images.