You are connecting from Lake Geneva Public Library, please login or register to take advantage of your institution's Ground News Plan.
Published 3 days ago • loading... • Updated 3 days ago
Why a landmark Supreme Court ruling has failed to keep racial bias out of jury selection
Researchers say Batson has led to few successful challenges, with only 68 capital cases reversed in 40 years, according to the Death Penalty Information Center.
Texas executed James Broadnax on April 30, 2026, the 40th anniversary of Batson v. Kentucky. Before seating the jury, the prosecutor dismissed all seven Black potential jurors using a spreadsheet that CNN noted bolded only their names.
Following the Civil War and passage of the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments to the Constitution, Black people were entitled to serve on juries nationwide in theory. The Supreme Court reaffirmed on April 30, 1986, that states cannot purposefully exclude jurors based on race.
Duke University law professor James Coleman noted that "juries with two or more members of color deliberate longer, discuss a wider range of evidence, and collectively are more accurate." Yet the Death Penalty Information Center identified only 68 successful cases across 16 states reversing convictions due to racial discrimination.
Prosecutors have learned to defend race-based challenges successfully, with courts generally accepting even the flimsiest excuses. A 2020 Berkeley Law report found the California Supreme Court identified a violation in only three cases over 30 years of Batson claims.
Legal scholar Sarah Claxton argued that states enacted vague, subjective standards requiring "good moral character" to exclude Black citizens. Forty years of Batson history suggests the Supreme Court's ruling merely scratched the surface of systemic exclusion.