US EditionWhat a Trump proposal to ban institutional investors could really mean for homebuyers
President Trump's proposal targets large investors who make up 1% to 5% of single-family home purchases to improve affordability for first-time buyers, analysts say.
- President Donald Trump proposed banning large institutional investors from purchasing single-family homes, directing the attorney general and Federal Trade Commission to enforce it with support from Senator Bernie Moreno.
- During 2020–22, institutional investors and mom-and-pop investors bought heavily, and while capital has dipped in recent years, most investor dollars still target entry-level homes, with large institutional players representing just 1% to 5% of purchases.
- First-Time buyers stand to gain from less investor competition, though NewHomeSource / Zonda analysis finds national impacts minimal; Tampa, Florida, Phoenix, and Las Vegas could see larger shifts.
- The proposal faces constitutional barriers as the Supreme Court of the United States treats business entities as legal persons, and legal analysis says it could violate the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, while Today in Ohio hosts noted doubts about presidential authority over the FTC.
- While lawyers challenge the plan, supporters argue the move may address affordability concerns, but experts warn removing investor buyers could harm sellers and broader housing market solutions are needed.
30 Articles
30 Articles
Braxton Steele: Housing ban plan is pure politics (Opinion)
In a gross oversimplification of the housing affordability crisis, President Donald Trump announced on Truth Social his plan to ban institutional investors from purchasing single-family homes. As satisfying as it would be to blame big, bad investment corporations for all…
Donald Trump’s housing proposal called constitutionally dead on arrival by legal experts
Trump’s proposal to ban institutional investors from buying single-family homes might be well-intentioned, but Today in Ohio hosts laid out Monday the significant constitutional hurdles that would likely render the plan impossible to implement.
Montana Standard
What a Trump proposal to ban institutional investors could really mean for homebuyers
NewHomeSource reports that Trump's proposal to ban institutional investors from buying homes may not significantly improve housing affordability, as these buyers represent only 1%-5% of the market.
The Fed’s War on Young Homeowners
President Trump began the first full week of 2026 with several announcements, one of which was likely to get missed in everything that’s been taking place: he committed his administration to “ban[ing] large institutional investors from buying more single-family homes,” because “[p]eople live in homes, not corporations.” A fair enough observation. However, according to the Brookings Institution, large institutional owners account for less than 3%…
This report has been edited for brevity from its original English version. President Donald Trump announced plans this month to prevent corporate investors from buying single-family homes, something many Nevadans, especially Democrats, had long anticipated. “The first thing I thought was, ‘Is he working with both parties to come up with a bill?’” Maurice Page, executive director of the Nevada Housing Coalition, told The Nevada Independent. “Beca…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 82% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
