U.S. law firm Susman Godfrey defeats Trump executive order
- Last Friday, U.S. District Judge Loren AliKhan permanently blocked President Trump’s executive order targeting Susman Godfrey, citing grave constitutional violations.
- The April 9 executive order, issued by President Donald Trump, aimed to retaliate against Susman Godfrey for defending election integrity and promoting racial diversity, violating constitutional rights.
- AliKhan's ruling found the order violated the Constitution, citing 'grave violations' and bipartisan judge rebukes over security clearance suspensions and access restrictions.
- Following this block, all federal officials are permanently enjoined from enforcing the order, with the Trump administration having 90 days to appeal, marking the fourth court victory against similar orders.
- Beyond Susman Godfrey, all four challenged firms prevailed in court, with nine prominent law firms settling to protect the independence of the bar from retaliatory orders.
88 Articles
88 Articles
4th Trump Executive Order Against Law Firm Nullified
“A DC federal judge has struck down President Donald Trump’s executive order targeting Houston-founded law firm Susman Godfrey, marking the fourth takedown of an executive order targeting a law firm,” Bloomberg reports.
Judge smacks down Trump order over 'grave' legal violations
A federal judge on Friday delivered a stinging blow to President Donald Trump’s push to punish elite law firms, ruling that one of his executive orders was riddled with “grave constitutional violations,” according to NPR.U.S. District Judge Lauren AliKhan permanently blocked Trump’s executive order ...
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 75% of the sources are Center
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium