University Students Feel 'Anxious, Confused and Distrustful' About AI in the Classroom and Among Their Peers
UNITED STATES AND TANZANIA, JUL 16 – Nearly one in three professors use AI without disclosing it, fueling student distrust and raising concerns over academic integrity and the impact on learning outcomes.
- In spring 2025, focus groups with 95 university students across campuses revealed widespread anxiety, confusion, and distrust about AI use in academics and peer interactions.
- These feelings stem from unclear rules on AI use, fears of unfair advantages from chatbots, and students doing extra work to verify peers’ assignments in an environment of diminished trust.
- Students and faculty showed different brain engagement patterns when writing essays using AI, Google, or no assistance, with those writing unaided exhibiting 55% greater brain activity than the ChatGPT users.
- Experts warned that uncritical dependence on AI threatens critical thinking, emphasized AI as a supplemental tool, and noted that responsible AI use requires clear policies and training in higher education.
- The findings imply that AI significantly affects learning, trust, and relationships in academia, signaling a need for better guidance to balance AI benefits with preserving student engagement and originality.
19 Articles
19 Articles
Tech Bro Builds App to 'Cheat on Everything,' and a Former Classmate Creates One to Detect It
A 21-year-old Columbia dropout built Cluely to help users “cheat on everything.” Now rebranded as a productivity tool, it’s facing scrutiny from critics, as well competition from Truely, an app by another Columbia student that detects stealth AI.
AI use linked to lower thinking skills
Recent scientific studies are shedding light on a worrying trend: the growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools, including popular chatbots like ChatGPT, may be linked to declines in critical thinking, memory retention, and problem-solving abilities. As AI-powered assistants become increasingly integrated into daily tasks, helping with writing, research, and decision-making… Source
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 45% of the sources are Center
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium