Some recent statements and reactions to them, particularly to the point where there is a partnership between Druze and Israel "even in the faith," and to the fact that Druze is an integral part of it, call for a debate that goes beyond the current political stance to a more profound question: who has the right to define the identity of a historical group? May legitimate fear turn into an entry point for rewriting its history?
This story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.
Some recent statements and reactions to them, particularly to the point where there is a partnership between Druze and Israel "even in the faith," and to the fact that Druze is an integral part of it, call for a debate that goes beyond the current political stance to a more profound question: who has the right to define the identity of a historical group? May legitimate fear turn into an entry point for rewriting its history?