US Edition
Angel Reese's Chicago Sky Teammates Are Fed Up With Her, Plan To Confront Her Over Negative Comments
Angel Reese criticized her teammates and leadership amid a 10-30 season, prompting a planned team meeting to address tensions and her subsequent apology.
- Annie Costabile of Front Office Sports wrote Wednesday that "Multiple league sources told FOS the entire team has seen Reese's comments and that teammates are unhappy with the direct attacks," with a meeting planned to confront Angel Reese, Chicago Sky forward.
- Angel Reese said she recently criticized Sky guards Rachel Banham and Hailey Van Lith's leadership and questioned Courtney Vandersloot's comeback, adding she might 'move in a different direction' if Chicago doesn't improve.
- After Wednesday's win, coach Tyler Marsh said the issue "is being addressed in-house," while Angel Reese stated, `I probably am frustrated with myself right now,' apologizing to teammates.
- Teammates organized a meeting after the game to address Angel Reese's comments and she apologized, but observers warned the dispute could destabilize the Chicago Sky locker room atmosphere.
- The franchise's broader issues include three straight losing seasons, with Chicago Sky front office unveiling a $40 million Bedford Park practice facility and Angel Reese standing as one of the league's most popular players alongside Caitlin Clark and A'ja Wilson.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?
14 Articles
14 Articles
The Advocate+2 Reposted by 2 other sources
Angel Reese apologizes to teammates after her critical comments on Sky players, franchise
Angel Reese, the LSU legend, has apologized to her Chicago Sky teammates following a viral Chicago Tribune story getting published where she was quoted suggesting the team needs better guards to win more games.
·Baton Rouge, United States
Read Full Article
Coverage Details
Total News Sources14
Leaning Left4Leaning Right1Center5Last UpdatedBias Distribution50% Center
Bias Distribution
- 50% of the sources are Center
50% Center
L 40%
C 50%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
