Published • loading... • Updated
Hampstead Ponds Trans Access Challenge Dismissed by High Court
Nearly 90% of 38,000 respondents support the City of London's trans-inclusive policy at Hampstead Heath bathing ponds amid ongoing policy review.
- On January 29, Mrs Justice Lieven dismissed gender-critical charity Sex Matters' judicial review at the High Court while the City of London Corporation published its consultation results.
- Following an April Supreme Court ruling that defined 'woman' and 'sex' by biological sex in the Equality Act 2010, Sex Matters challenged the City policy allowing trans people access by gender identity as sex discrimination.
- More than 38,000 respondents took part in the consultation, with 86% backing existing trans-inclusive access at Kenwood Ladies', Highgate Men's and Hampstead Mixed ponds.
- Because the City is 'in the process' of deciding, the judge ruled that Mrs Justice Lieven found the challenge premature and the consultation findings will be presented to City Corporation committees while current admission rules remain.
- Trans rights groups such as TransLucent and Trans+ Solidarity Alliance said the legal challenge wasted public money, while the City said it will communicate wider decisions in the months ahead.
Insights by Ground AI
16 Articles
16 Articles
High Court dismisses legal challenge against trans access to Hampstead ponds
The High Court has dismissed a charity’s legal challenge against rules allowing trans people to use the single-sex facilities at Hampstead Heath’s swimming ponds. Sex Matters had taken legal action against the City of London Corporation, which operates the men’s, ladies’ and mixed bathing ponds in north London. The charity argued allowing trans people to use the facilities for the gender with which they identify amounted to sex discrimination. H…
·London, United Kingdom
Read Full ArticleCoverage Details
Total News Sources16
Leaning Left6Leaning Right3Center3Last UpdatedBias Distribution50% Left
Bias Distribution
- 50% of the sources lean Left
50% Left
L 50%
C 25%
R 25%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium











