Trump Asks Court to Freeze Tariff Ruling Amid Import Surge Fears
The ruling bars collection from the plaintiffs but leaves most importers exposed as the administration is expected to appeal.
- On Thursday, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled President Donald Trump's 10% global tariffs "invalid" and "unauthorized by law" for three specific plaintiffs challenging the administration's use of Section 122.
- Following a Supreme Court decision invalidating earlier tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, the administration invoked Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 in February to impose these levies as a stopgap measure.
- Because the injunction applies only to the State of Washington, Burlap & Barrel, and Basic Fun, other importers must pursue their own litigation to seek relief from the duties.
- The administration will appeal the ruling, United States Trade Representative Jamieson Greer confirmed, potentially seeking to continue tariff collection while the case moves through appellate courts.
- As the current Section 122 levies expire July 24, investigations under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 are targeting unfair trade practices in over 70 countries, representing 99% of U.S. imports.
29 Articles
29 Articles
Trump asks court to freeze tariff ruling amid import surge fears
(The Center Square) – The Trump administration asked the U.S. Court of International Trade on Monday to pause its ruling blocking the president's Section 122 tariffs, warning that even a temporary halt could disrupt trade negotiations and trigger a surge…
Conservative Group Applauds Recent Court Decision Striking Down New Tariff Proposals by Trump White House
In February of this year, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the tariffs imposed by the Trump administration were unconstitutional. Within days, President Trump announced there would immediately be a new round of tariffs. Now, the United States Court of International Trade has ruled that the tariffs imposed by the Trump Administration under Section 122 of […] The post Conservative Group Applauds Recent Court Decision Striking Down New Tariff Proposals…
Trade court deals narrow blow to Trump’s 10% tariff strategy, but the broader trade agenda faces mounting legal pressure
A federal trade court decided that President Donald Trump’s temporary 10% tariffs were improperly justified under an old law (Section 122). However, the court did not block the tariffs for everyone—it only stopped them for two private companies (Basic Fun! and Burlap & Barrel) and the State of Washington. Most importers still have to pay […]
US court invalidates Trump’s 10 percent global tariff for three plaintiffs
The US Court of International Trade ruled against the Trump administration’s sweeping 10 percent global tariff in a 2-1 decision on Thursday. The majority stated that the tariffs are “invalid” and “unauthorized by law,” calling for the administration to halt collecting tariffs from the plaintiffs and refund prior payments. The court’s decision applied to three of the plaintiffs, the state of Washington and two businesses, spice company Burlap & …
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 45% of the sources are Center, 44% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium













![[your]NEWS](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgroundnews.b-cdn.net%2Finterests%2Ffb6dc495f74049f513563c33352175eaa0ecd509.jpg%3Fwidth%3D60&w=128&q=75)



