The Judge Rejects Zapatero's Request to Set Aside the Jeweler of Choice to Value His Jewels
36 Articles
36 Articles
The former president of the government has not managed to remove the jewelry (which took the jewels at 1.3 million) from the new valuation. The judge has inadmissible the challenge raised by Zapatero and maintains that his arguments do not prove any of the cases provided by law to question the expert.
The investigator in the Plus Ultra case states that giving prior opinions is not enough to disqualify an expert
El Mundo
The magistrate of the National High Court José Luis Calama supports the expertise in the "Plus Ultra case" against the complaint of the former president of the government for "apparent lack of impartiality" Read
Judge Calama sees "premature" the challenge proposed by Zapatero, which alluded to the lack of impartiality of the owner of the jewelry house due to his demonstrations in the media.
Sees "precipitated" the intention of the former president and highlights that the expert report is "one more test" subject to...
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 50% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
![[Opinion] Jealousy, Geolocation and ‘Likes’ Watched: Obsession with Fidelity Breaks Into the TikTok Generation](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgrnd.b-cdn.net%2Finterests%2F247d7f192b40d176427608d38823fce4a6ac70d8.jpg&w=1440&q=75)
