Supreme Court to decide whether ISPs must disconnect users accused of piracy
- On June 30, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review a $1 billion lawsuit against Cox Communications over users' alleged music piracy.
- The case stems from 2018 lawsuits by Universal, Warner, and Sony accusing Cox of failing to terminate subscribers who repeatedly infringed copyrights.
- A federal appeals court determined that Cox was responsible for intentional contributory infringement but set aside the initial $1 billion damages award and instructed that a new trial be conducted.
- Cox called the ruling draconian, warning it could jeopardize internet access for innocent users, while the Recording Industry Association said ISPs must face liability for repeated violators.
- The Supreme Court’s decision could fundamentally change how ISPs manage piracy accusations and balance copyright enforcement with preserving open internet access.
14 Articles
14 Articles
Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Challenge to $1 Billion Music Piracy Verdict
The Supreme Court decided on June 30 to review a $1 billion jury verdict that music labels won against an internet service provider over music piracy that the provider’s customers allegedly committed. The new decision took the form of an unsigned order in Cox Communications Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment. No justices dissented. The court did not explain its ruling. The petitioner, Cox Communications, an internet service provider, runs six cabl…
Supreme Court To Hear Case On Whether Cox Communications Is Liable For Users’ Music Piracy
The Supreme Court agreed to hear a case brought by Cox Communications over whether it should be held liable for music piracy by its users. The case could have a major impact on how online piracy is policed, long a source of frustration among content creators who have pressed tech companies, internet providers and others […]
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 67% of the sources are Center
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium