Supreme Court sides with straight woman in 'reverse discrimination' case
- The US Supreme Court unanimously ruled Thursday in favor of Marlean Ames, an Ohio woman who alleges she was passed over for a job advancement and subsequently demoted due to her heterosexual orientation.
- After more than two decades with Ohio's juvenile corrections agency, Ames filed a lawsuit claiming she faced discrimination because of her heterosexuality, arguing that favoritism toward LGBTQ coworkers hindered her career advancement.
- Lower courts required majority group plaintiffs like Ames to show additional 'background circumstances' of discrimination, which she failed to provide, prompting Supreme Court review.
- The court ruled the standard of proof must be equal for all discrimination claims, effectively lowering the burden of proof and making it easier to file reverse discrimination lawsuits.
- The decision alters legal standards in 20 states and Washington, D.C., potentially increasing reverse discrimination lawsuits filed by majority groups such as white or heterosexual individuals.
211 Articles
211 Articles

'Reverse discrimination' ruling is a win for the rule of law
White individuals and straight people do not need to meet a higher burden of proof than members of minority groups to prevail in employment discrimination suits, the Supreme Court held last week.
Unanimous Supreme Court deals fatal blow to extreme identity politics - Washington Examiner
The Supreme Court‘s rulings are often controversial and divided along party lines. But sometimes, unlike our other branches of government, the court still reaches bipartisan consensus — and it just did exactly that, to deal a fatal blow to extreme identity politics. Here’s the background. The high court just ruled unanimously, 9-0, in favor of an Ohio woman, Marlean Ames, who claims she was discriminated against in employment for being heterose…
Supreme Court Gives Green Light for Straight Woman to Sue for ‘Reverse Discrimination’
In a resounding affirmation of legal equality, the U.S. Supreme Court has unanimously ruled that straight, white, or otherwise “majority” individuals are entitled to the same anti-discrimination protections under federal law as any minority group. The post Supreme Court Gives Green Light for Straight Woman to Sue for ‘Reverse Discrimination’ appeared first on Slay News.
How Appealing Weekly Roundup - Above the Law
Ed. note: A weekly roundup of just a few items from Howard Bashman’s How Appealing blog, the Web’s first blog devoted to appellate litigation. Check out these stories and more at How Appealing. “Supreme Court Rules for Straight Woman in Job Discrimination Suit; The justices rejected an appeals court’s requirement that members of majority groups meet a heightened standard to win employment discrimination cases”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times …
Supreme Court Affirms: Discrimination Can Affect Majority Groups Too
The Supreme Court has now ruled in favor of the idea that you don’t have to be a member of a minority group in order to be discriminated against.That is obviously true. The fact of the matter is that you can certainly be a white, straight male and be discriminated against, or, in the case reviewed by the Supreme Court, a white, straight female.According to The New York Times:The Supreme Court on Thursday unanimously ruled in favor of a straight …
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 45% of the sources are Center
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage