Skip to main content
institutional access

You are connecting from
Lake Geneva Public Library,
please login or register to take advantage of your institution's Ground News Plan.

Published loading...Updated

Supreme Court shuts down thousands of lawsuits that claim Roundup weedkiller might cause cancer

The 7-2 ruling says federal labeling rules bar state failure-to-warn claims, a decision expected to affect about 200,000 Roundup-related claims.

  • The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 7–2 on Thursday in favor of Monsanto , dealing a massive legal victory to the agrochemical giant by heavily restricting the ability of cancer patients to sue over the weedkiller Roundup.
  • The landmark decision establishes that federal regulation overrides state law, with Justice Brett Kavanaugh writing for the majority that because the EPA evaluated glyphosate and explicitly determined it does not require a cancer warning, state-level "failure to warn" lawsuits are legally preempted.
  • The ruling severely handicaps a wave of roughly 200,000 product liability claims, shutting the door on tens of thousands of pending lawsuits filed by home users and groundskeepers who allege they developed non-Hodgkin lymphoma from the product.
  • The case centered on Missouri resident John Durnell, who was awarded $1.25 million by a state jury in 2023 after using Roundup for over two decades to beautify local parks; Thursday’s high court decision effectively invalidates those state court findings.
  • The decision creates a complex political rift for the Trump administration, as the ruling aligns with the administration's business deregulation goals but severely frustrates Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and the "Make America Healthy Again" movement, which has fiercely campaigned to outlaw glyphosate.
Insights by Ground AI

96 Articles

Center

The Bayer Group won a victory in the U.S. Supreme Court in the legal dispute over the alleged cancer risks of its weed destroyer with the active substance glyphosate. According to the ruling, Bayer cannot be sued for lack of cancer warnings on packaging of weed destroyers.

·Germany
Read Full Article
Center

The complaints were based on the alleged risk of cancer from Roundup herbicide. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Bayer could not be blamed for not placing an additional health warning on his products.

·France
Read Full Article
Lean Left

On Thursday, 25 June, the judges estimated that the agri-food giant could not be convicted for the absence of additional health warnings on its products, as the US Federal Environmental Protection Agency did not impose any alerts on the carcinogenic potential of the Roundup.

·Paris, France
Read Full Article
Lean Left

Seven of the nine judges considered that the manufacturer could not be accused of not placing an additional health warning on its products.

Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • 45% of the sources lean Left
45% Left

Factuality Info Icon

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

Info Icon

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

Reuters broke the news in New York, United States on Thursday, June 25, 2026.
Too Big Arrow Icon
Sources are mostly out of (0)

Similar News Topics

News
Feed Dots Icon
For You
Search Icon
Search
Blindspot LogoBlindspotLocal