What You Need to Know About the Supreme Court’s Monsanto Ruling

What you need to know about the Supreme Court’s Monsanto ruling

The US Supreme Court last week ruled in favor of the former Monsanto company in a closely watched case that limits people’s ability to sue pesticide companies for alleged illnesses or injuries. Editorial intern Julie Zenderoudi breaks it down. Read more: US Supreme Court rules for Monsanto in case over pesticides and cancer warnings The post WATCH: What you need to know about the Supreme Court’s Monsanto ruling appeared first on The New Lede.

As MAHA activists fumed over the Supreme Court’s decision to shield Monsanto owner Bayer, right-wing cable news networks appeared to avoid the topic

While MAHA decried the Supreme Court’s recent Monsanto Co. v. Durnell decision, Fox networks completely ignored the ruling, and Newsmax barely touched it, dedicating only 3 minutes of coverage to the decision. The scant coverage on right-wing cable networks is notable given the immediate wave of backlash to the decision that came from the MAHA coalition, which Donald Trump successfully courted during the 2024 campaign cycle with promises that “w…

Minnesota Roundup lawsuits derailed by Supreme Court decision

Attorneys say the ruling closes one of the most common legal paths for people alleging health harms from glyphosate and other pesticides.

Monsanto SCOTUS Victory Sparks MAHA Revolt — EPA’s Glyphosate Response Revealed

(Daily Signal)—Despite the backlash since Thursday’s Supreme Court ruling shielding Monsanto from liability, the Environmental Protection Agency is pushing ahead on glyphosate, telling the Daily Signal how it plans to navigate the Make America Healthy Again movement’s growing outrage. In a 7-2 decision on Thursday, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Monsanto, now owned by Bayer, will be shielded from liability over Roundup, its widely used brand …

Cabashing the Roundup Litigation

Mass tort litigation grows like weeds. Last week, the Supreme Court created the ultimate lawsuit-killer by rejecting state court claims that conflict with federal statutes.