US Supreme Court Lets Fuel Producers Challenge California Emissions Standards
CALIFORNIA, UNITED STATES, JUN 20 – The Supreme Court ruled 7-2 to restore fuel producers' right to challenge California's stricter vehicle emissions and electric vehicle mandates, impacting regulatory authority and market dynamics.
- The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 7-2 on June 20, 2025, allowing energy producers to sue the EPA over its 2022 approval of California's strict vehicle emissions standards.
- The case arose after fuel producers and 17 Republican-led states challenged the EPA waiver granted by President Biden in 2022, which Trump had previously blocked with a congressional resolution.
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh authored the majority opinion emphasizing that the government cannot evade lawsuits by claiming regulated businesses lack standing, while Justices Sotomayor and Jackson dissented, questioning the standing ruling.
- The EPA argued that consumer demand for electric vehicles would exceed California's mandate and that the regulations would have minimal impact, while fuel producers contend stricter rules reduce gas-powered car manufacturing and increase compliance costs.
- The ruling revives the lawsuit but leaves the merits to the court of appeals, setting a precedent for future challenges to federal regulations while maintaining California's authority to enforce pollution standards.
99 Articles
99 Articles

California’s war on carbon emissions faces setbacks in court and Congress
COMMENTARY: California’s self-designated deadline for achieving net zero emissions of greenhouse gases is 20 years away. But what is happening — or not happening — in multiple arenas now may determine whether that goal is met.
California's war on carbon emissions faces setbacks in court and Congress
California’s self-designated deadline for achieving net zero emissions of greenhouse gases is 20 years away. But what is happening — or not happening — in multiple arenas now may determine whether that goal is met. The largest single source of emissions is the nearly 1 billion miles that Californians drive each day. Accordingly the state has ordered that by 2035, all new cars sold must be zero-emission vehicles (ZEVs). However, the state has int…
SCOTUS lets fuel industry challenge California’s emission rules
A group of fuel producers can now proceed with their lawsuit against California’s vehicle emission standards. This case could significantly impact the state’s zero direct-tailpipe emission vehicle policies. In a 7-2 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed a ruling from the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. The lower court had dismissed the lawsuit, stating the fuel producers lacked standing to challenge the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA)…
Supreme Court allows fossil fuel companies to sue over California clean car rules
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 7-2 that fuel producers can challenge California’s authority to set stricter emissions limits under a longstanding Clean Air Act waiver.Adam Liptak reports for The New York Times.In short:The justices ruled that fuel producers have legal standing to sue over California’s vehicle emissions rules, even though the case doesn’t yet touch on the legality of those standards.California has long held a federal waiver allowin…
Supreme Court delivers crushing blow to California's electric vehicle scheme that has Democrats fuming - Political Animal News
Supreme Court delivers major setback to California’s electric vehicle mandates in 7-2 ruling, empowering energy companies to challenge EPA-backed regulations threatening American energy independence. California’s climate extremists just got blindsided by bad news. The Supreme Court handed down a decision that has environmental radicals scrambling for cover. And the Supreme Court delivered a crushing blow […]
EPA moves to lift air standards rule, lawsuit follows
This story is excerpted from the MT Lowdown, a weekly newsletter digest containing original reporting and analysis published every Friday. The Trump administration’s attempt to circumvent tightened emissions standards that the president’s predecessor adopted for coal-fired power plants has generated a lawsuit with ramifications for Montana’s largest power plant. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency moved June 11 to reverse the Mercury and Ai…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 44% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium