US EditionSupreme Court justices appear skeptical that Trump tariffs are legal
- In a packed marble courtroom, the US Supreme Court in Washington, D.C. opened oral arguments Wednesday, with Chief Justice John Roberts, Amy Coney Barrett, and Neil Gorsuch questioning US Solicitor General John Sauer for over 45 minutes.
- Invoking the IEEPA earlier this year, the administration applied levies from 10% to 50% on imports initially targeting China, Mexico and Canada, asserting emergency tariff authority.
- Neal Katyal argued challengers' case that revenue-raising tariffs exceed presidential authority, with Roberts warning `The justification is being used for power to impose tariffs on any product from any country in any amount, for any length of time`.
- This year analysts note the ruling covers roughly $90bn in tariffs already paid, and if the Supreme Court rules for President Donald Trump, it would overturn three lower courts.
- On Tuesday, Press Secretary Karoline Leavett said the administration is preparing alternatives as advisors warned it would be imprudent not to plan for prolonged litigation.
231 Articles
231 Articles
Even the conservative judges in the U.S. Supreme Court are skeptical as to whether the president is allowed to impose almost unlimited tariffs. According to the online forecast markets, a defeat of the president has become more likely.
Fox News' Gregg Jarrett Explains Why Justices Might Side With Congress On Trade And Tax Powers
Fox News legal analyst Gregg Jarrett said Wednesday that the Supreme Court’s skepticism during oral arguments suggests a majority of justices may rule that President Donald Trump overstepped his constitutional authority. The Supreme Court appeared ready Wednesday to curb Trump’s use of emergency powers to impose tariffs, grilling his legal team over whether he encroached on Congress’ […] Fox News’ Gregg Jarrett Explains Why Justices Might Side W…
The purpose of the hearing before the highest court in the country was to determine whether or not the U.S. president had the right to impose these customs duties without going to Congress, using an exception law that had not been imagined for this purpose. The decision will be made by the U.S. president.
Trump's tariff power grab faces hostile Supreme Court reception
Victor Schwartz, founder and president of VOS Selections, spoke to reporters outside the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday, Nov. 5, 2025. Schwartz, a New York-based wine and spirits importer of 40 years, was the lead plaintiff in the case against President Donald Trump's sweeping emergency tariffs. (Photo by Ashley Murray/States Newsroom)WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court during lengthy arguments Wednesday weighed whether President Donald Trump v…
Key takeaways from Trump's rocky Supreme Court showdown over global tariffs
The US Supreme Court appeared sceptical of President Donald Trump’s sweeping claim of authority to impose global tariffs under emergency powers, raising key constitutional questions about executive overreach and taxation.
Supreme Court justices question Trump's authority to impose sweeping tariffs on foreign goods
The Supreme Court expressed significant skepticism Wednesday toward President Trump's expansive use of tariffs, questioning whether Congress truly delegated such broad authority to impose duties on foreign goods.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 46% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
