Landmark Decision From the Supreme Court: An Employee Who Hits a Colleague Can Be Dismissed without Compensation.
8 Articles
8 Articles
The 9th Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals found the termination of an employee's contract without compensation to be lawful, given that the employee struck a colleague with an object during an argument at work.
In Balıkesir, a worker who struck a colleague with an object was dismissed without compensation. Claiming self-defense, the worker filed a lawsuit demanding compensation. The 9th Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals upheld the employer's decision to terminate the employment without compensation, finding it lawful.
The 9th Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals has issued a noteworthy ruling in a compensation case filed by a worker dismissed from their job due to an incident at the workplace. While the local court's decision in favor of the worker was overturned on appeal, the Supreme Court of Appeals made the final decision.
The 9th Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals found the termination of an employee's employment contract without compensation to be justifiable, given that the employee struck their shift supervisor on the head with an object during an argument at work.
The 9th Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal of an employee without compensation for striking a colleague during an argument at work. The Chamber ruled that the employee's act of aggression constituted a valid reason for termination by the employer.
The 9th Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals upheld the lawful dismissal of an employee without compensation for striking a colleague during an argument at work.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium










