People, Not Glaciers, Transported Rocks to Stonehenge, Study Confirms
Curtin University researchers analyzed over 500 zircon crystals in river sediments near Stonehenge and found no mineral evidence of glacial transport, supporting human movement of the stones.
7 Articles
7 Articles
Stonehenge Solved? New Evidence Shows Humans, Not Glaciers, Moved the Stones
New research sheds light on one of archaeology’s longest-running debates: how Stonehenge’s massive bluestones reached their final resting place. A new study from Curtin University is reshaping how scientists understand the origins of Stonehenge’s iconic bluestones, offering the most convincing evidence yet that they were carried to the site by people rather than by moving [...]
Tiny Evidence Upends a Controversial Stonehenge Theory
For centuries, Stonehenge has attracted all sorts of theories—varying widely in credibility—as to how it cropped up some 5,000 years ago. Nautilus Members enjoy an ad-free experience. Log in or Join now . Some explanations have leaned outlandish, pointing to aliens or Merlin the wizard, while scientists have squabbled over the more probable stone origin stories. For example, some teams have proposed that glaciers pushed some of these stones t…
New Evidence Suggests Stonehenge Stones Were Moved by People, Not Ice
For more than a century, researchers have debated how Stonehenge’s bluestones reached Salisbury Plain. The idea that these stones arrived by glacial movement has circulated through archaeological discussions since the early twentieth century. The alternative has always been direct human transport across long distances. Both explanations have appeared in academic literature, exhibitions, and public talks, […] The post New Evidence Suggests Stoneh…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 80% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium




