Casino mogul asks US Supreme Court to revisit landmark defamation rule
- Steve Wynn has petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn the actual malice standard established in New York Times Co. V. Sullivan, which protects press freedom in defamation cases involving public figures.
- Wynn's defamation lawsuit against The Associated Press was dismissed by the Nevada Supreme Court, which ruled he failed to prove the report was published with actual malice.
- Legal experts warn that revisiting the actual malice standard could weaken press protections and impact journalists reporting on public figures.
- The Supreme Court has previously declined to reconsider the Sullivan standard, despite interest from Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?
8 Articles
8 Articles
All
Left
3
Center
3
Right
1
Coverage Details
Total News Sources8
Leaning Left3Leaning Right1Center3Last UpdatedBias Distribution43% Left, 43% Center
Bias Distribution
- 43% of the sources lean Left, 43% of the sources are Center
43% Center
L 43%
C 43%
14%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage