South Africa withdraws AI policy due to fake AI-generated sources
An internal review found 67 references in the draft were fake or unverified, prompting a withdrawal and a new review of the policy.
- Communications and Digital Technologies Minister Solly Malatsi withdrew the Draft National Artificial Intelligence policy on Sunday evening after internal investigations confirmed it contained fictitious sources in its reference list.
- News24 investigation revealed that 67 references listed in the policy were either fictitious or non-existent, prompting scrutiny over how the document was compiled using artificial intelligence without proper verification.
- Khusela Diko, chairperson of the portfolio committee on communications and digital technologies, demanded Malatsi subject the policy to "the rigorous review " before re-release, calling for full ownership of the product.
- On Saturday, Malatsi announced an internal investigation, directing the director-general to take action against anyone found responsible for wrongdoing in the policy's compilation process.
- The Policy Framework aimed to foster "Artificial Intelligence for inclusive economic growth, job creation, cost reduction and a developing Africa" through establishing an Ethics Board, Safety Institute, and Insurance Superfund.
18 Articles
18 Articles
Malatsi withdraws AI policy tainted by fictitious references
Communications and Digital Technology Minister Solly Malatsi has withdrawn the Draft National Artificial Intelligence Policy, a day after News24 revealed that it contained at least six made-up references that were likely AI-generated hallucinations.
Malatsi withdraws draft AI policy over fake citations – The Mail & Guardian
Communications and Digital Technologies Minister Solly Malatsi has withdrawn South Africa’s draft national artificial intelligence (AI) policy after it emerged that the document’s reference list included fictitious sources. In a statement on Sunday, Malatsi said an internal review confirmed the mistake was noticed after “revelations” emerged about unverifiable references. “This failure is not a mere technical issue but has compromised the integr…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 45% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium












