Published • loading... • Updated
Senate committee recommends removing immigration measures from border bill
The committee cited risks to human rights, privacy, and fairness in immigration enforcement and called for removal of parts affecting 37% of recent asylum claims, experts said.
- On February 23, 2026, the Senate social affairs committee urged deletion or significant modification of Bill C-12's immigration-related sections, The Canadian Press reported.
- Witnesses told the committee that the bill could violate human rights and procedural fairness, and groups including the Canadian Bar Association and Amnesty International warned it risks a two-tier asylum system denying in-person hearings to vulnerable claimants.
- The committee recommends increasing the one-year filing cutoff to five years, as Diab said 37 per cent of claims filed between June 3 and Oct. 31, 2025, would be disallowed, about 19,000 of 50,000 applications.
- The report urges adding robust parliamentary oversight and a sunset clause, noting the bill would give cabinet authority to cancel or modify immigration documents on 'public interest' grounds.
- Senators rejected making the immigration section retroactive to June 24, 2020, and want it to take effect only upon royal assent, with a second-reading vote deadline of Feb. 26.
Insights by Ground AI
28 Articles
28 Articles
+8 Reposted by 8 other sources
Immigration measures stay in border bill with no amendment
OTTAWA — Senators on the national security committee have approved the immigration measures outlined in the government's border bill, C-12, with no amendment, despite the Senate social affairs committee recommending those areas be withdrawn entirely.
‘Dangerous' Bill C-12’s immigration changes give too much power to cabinet and department: Sen. McPhedran and legal rights groups
The bill's proposal for a new timeline for refugee applications that would be in effect starting in 2020—more than five years prior to the bill even being passed—and the power to cancel large numbers of immigration documents at once are causing concerns.
Coverage Details
Total News Sources28
Leaning Left23Leaning Right0Center3Last UpdatedBias Distribution88% Left
Bias Distribution
- 88% of the sources lean Left
88% Left
L 88%
12%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium











