Scandal in Court: Court Revealed that He Used AI and Sneaked in Until Instructions
4 Articles
4 Articles
The deputy rapporteur of the Ninth Chamber, Felipe Larraín, was exposed by leaving by mistake an instruction for artificial intelligence in the resolution of a civil case. The episode evidenced the absence of a clear protocol within the judiciary to regulate the use of this digital tool in the drafting of the statement of sentences.
“You are a judge of the Court of Appeal who must draft the judgment’s consideration [rejecting/receiving] the appeal...
The Ninth Chamber of the court of elzada had to rectify ex officio an executive sentence after it was discovered that in the first pages of the document were pasted the instructions given to a chatbot. Along with ordering the elimination of texts external to the case, the judiciary demanded an urgent report from the alternate rapporteur in charge for [...] The entry Assess sanctions: a prompt slips into the file and betrays the use of AI in a ju…
“You are a judge of the Court of Appeal who must draft the judgment’s consideration [rejecting/accepting] the appeal. This sentence must be drafted according to these instructions,” that was the prompt that was used to write a judgment in court. The most scandalous thing is that from the Ninth Chamber of the Court of Appeal...
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 100% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
