Don’t Believe Players’ Cooked-up, ‘Parroted’ Story, Crown Says in Closing Arguments at Hockey Canada Trial
7 Articles
7 Articles
RECAP | E.M. ‘did not choose’ to consent to sex acts with ex-Hockey Canada players, Crown argues at trial
Assistant Crown attorney Meaghan Cunningham began her closing submissions Wednesday. She took aim at evidence submitted by the defence teams, saying it relied on “myths and stereotypes” about consent.
Crown Presents Closing Arguments in High-Profile Hockey Assault Trial
The Crown delivered its closing arguments in a high-profile trial involving five former NHL players accused of sexual assault, emphasizing that the complainant, E.M., was not the instigator of the events in June 2018. Contrary to defense assertions, Assistant Crown attorney Meaghan Cunningham argued that testimony from players supports E.M.’s account, challenging claims that she aggressively sought sexual encounters. Key evidence indicates that …
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 75% of the sources lean Left
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium