US Edition
[Opinion] “Real Live Flesh and Blood Man” Still Subject to Australian Law
Summary by Lowering the Bar
This story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.1 Articles
1 Articles
All
Left
Center
Right
“Real Live Flesh and Blood Man” Still Subject to Australian Law
Why has a link to R v Sweet, a decision by a Queensland district court, been in my bookmarks bar for almost five years, probably? Two-part answer: (1) it’s one of several amusing opinions rejecting the nutball claims of so-called “sovereign citizens,” so it’s worth mentioning; and (2) I occasionally procrastinate. But I eventually get around to whatever it was, so here this one is. As do most of these people, the plaintiff contended that he has …
Coverage Details
Total News Sources1
Leaning Left0Leaning Right0Center0Last UpdatedBias DistributionNo sources with tracked biases.
Bias Distribution
- There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage
