Publicus: During the Summer Energy Crisis, Fidesz Supporters Were Much Less Willing to Save on Electricity and Drinking Water than Tisza Supporters
This story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.6 Articles
6 Articles
During the summer energy crisis, Fidesz voters were much less willing to save on electricity and drinking water than Tisza sympathizers, according to new research by the Publicus Institute, in which the country's opinion on Paks 2 was also divided.
During the summer energy crisis, Fidesz supporters were much less willing to save electricity and drinking water than Tisza supporters, the Publicus Institute said in its survey. According to the Népszava article, the majority rated the government's crisis management as excellent or good and believed that Paks 2 should be built.
During the summer energy crisis, Fidesz supporters were much less willing to save electricity and drinking water than Tisza supporters, the Publicus Institute said in its survey. According to the Népszava article, the majority rated the government's crisis management as excellent or good and believed that Paks 2 should be built.
According to the survey, 48 percent of Hungarians believed that it was primarily the responsibility of previous governments that the country faced an energy crisis and water and electricity shortages in the summer.
The government asked in vain. The post Publicus: Fidesz members were much less willing to save during the energy crisis first appeared on 24.hu.
The majority rated the government's crisis management as excellent or good and believe that Paks 2 should be built. True, not necessarily with the Russians.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
