Brazil Calls for the Responsibility of 'Res' for Illegal Content
7 Articles
7 Articles
Barroso defends a decision that extends responsibility for the platforms by content and refuses to risk censorship. Learn more
"There is no political-ideological field, we need, especially in the field of family, child, adolescent, consumer, public policies with regard to citizens' health, we need a quick response tool against news that is not true," said Ricardo Lewandowski in a joint interview to Lusa and Efe. "The more false news of these remains in the air, the more deaths, more injuries to health, not just individual as a public," he said, along the Lisbon Forum, w…
Commenting on the decision of the STF on content published on digital platforms, Senator Esperidão Amin (PP-SC) stated that the Court does not have the right to legislate and impose the third-party big techs censored. Senator Plínio Valério (PSDB – AM) defended the reduction of the mandate of STF ministers. The MP said that the “Supreme... The post Senators tried to react to the STF appeared first on The Antagnonist.
Editorial of the Journal of 28 June 2025 criticized the recent decision of the Supreme Federal Court (STF), in which, by majority, declared article 19 of the Civil Framework of the Internet. Read more (07/02/2025)
The President of the STF explained the decision to define rules to remove illegal content from social networks in Brazil without compromising freedom of expression.
According to lawyer Solano Camargo, the STF decision has glaring structural flaws, in addition to using very open terms that will be difficult for users, networks and the judiciary to interpret. The post The STF decision on article 19 of the Internet Civil Rights Framework appeared first on Monitor Mercantil.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium