Las Vegas Review-Journal: Climate Alarmists Call Worst-Case Scenario ‘Implausible’
Critics say dire climate warnings pushed costly energy changes while global emissions climbed from 22.7 billion tons in 1990 to 38 billion tons in 2024.
6 Articles
6 Articles
Climate alarmists call worst-case scenario ‘implausible’
For years, radical climate activists have painted a bleak view of the future. Most scientists believe that burning fossil fuels releases greenhouse gases, which remain in the atmosphere, and that these gases trap additional heat, which warms the planet. This has led to concerns about “global warming.” But when the Earth didn’t warm as quickly as some dire prognosticators projected, the term “climate change” became more widely used. The post Clim…
The World Climate Council cancels the end of the world – the crisis is over, with oil and gas? All hot air! None of what circulates after a climate study is more than a symptom of heat-induced hallucinations.
POLITICO admits UN’s worst-case modeling predictions (RCP8.5) were designed to scare nations into climate action: ‘High-emissions scenario was always viewed as an unlikely outlier to help galvanize policymakers to reduce greenhouse gases’
By Zack Colman Key excerpt: The shift in Washington has been driven by President Donald Trump, who has for years dismissed climate change as a hoax, and even sought as recently as last weekend to d…
Editorial: Climate alarmists call worst-case scenario 'implausible'
Questioning apocalyptic climate forecasts is now the conventional wisdom. For years, radical climate activists have painted a bleak view of the future. Most scientists believe that burning fossil fuels releases greenhouse gases, which remain in ...
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 67% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium




