Pellet guns, harassment of women, cop injuries focus of SC panel's probe into CJP protest
The court said the panel must first examine pellet gun use, targeted violence and witness protection before broader constitutional questions.
- On Wednesday, the Supreme Court rejected petitioners' pleas to reconstitute its five-member High-Powered Enquiry Committee , citing "conjecture and preconceived notions" while affirming the committee's probe into July Cockroach Janta Party protests.
- The committee has been asked, "in the first instance," to examine four specific issues: pellet gun use, targeted violence against female protesters, injuries to police personnel, and property destruction "occasioned on either side."
- Justices appointed senior advocate Monika Gusain and advocate-on-record C Solomon as amici curiae to act as an "independent arbiter," while directing the HPEC to create an online portal for confidential witness submissions.
- Addressing intimidation concerns, the court ordered Delhi Police to assess the threat to a 14-year-old protester and her family, mandating immediate security and a status report before the next hearing.
- The Supreme Court clarified that "broader constitutional questions" arising from the protests remain under its jurisdiction, with the next hearing scheduled for October 9 to review the committee's initial findings.
17 Articles
17 Articles
Supreme Court Declines to Reconstitute HPEC Probing CJP Protest Violence
Get latest articles and stories on India at LatestLY. The Supreme Court has declined a plea seeking reconstitution of the High-Powered Enquiry Committee (HPEC) constituted to examine the violence during the July Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) student protests at Delhi’s Jantar Mantar, observing that the panel had only recently commenced its work. India News | Supreme Court Declines to Reconstitute HPEC Probing CJP Protest Violence.
CJP protest: SC refuses panel reconstitution over 'police excesses'
New Delhi: The Supreme Court has refused to reconstitute a five-member high-powered committee set up to examine alleged police excesses against student protesters in Delhi, underlining that allegations against the panel were conjectures and preconceived notions. A bench comprising Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana said the … Get the latest updates in Hyderabad City News, Technology, Entertainment, …
CJP Protests: Supreme Court Rejects Plea To Reconstitute Panel Probing Jantar Mantar Violence
The petitioners had questioned the impartiality of some committee members, with advocate Prashant Bhushan raising concerns over a former DGP’s alleged links to a senior functionary who could come under scrutiny.
CJP protest: SC refuses reconstitution of panel to probe 'police excesses', says allegations mere conjecture
New Delhi, Sep 16 (PTI) The Supreme Court has refused to reconstitute a five-member high-powered committee set up to examine alleged police excesses against student protesters in Delhi, underlining that allegations against the panel were conjectures and preconceived notions. A bench comprising Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V […]
Supreme Court refuses to reconstitute panel probing police excesses against student protesters
The Supreme Court declined to alter the high-powered committee examining police actions. Objections against committee members were deemed based on conjecture and preconceived notions. The court directed the committee to proceed with its examination of allegations. Vulnerable witnesses will receive due protection and their identities kept confidential. Senior Advocate Monika Gusain will represent the committee as an independent arbiter.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 56% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
