OpenAI, Anthropic and Google Are Working to Create an AI Standards Body
- On Tuesday, OpenAI confirmed it is working with Anthropic and Google to create a self-regulatory "Standards Body" for AI safety, modeled after the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
- Google DeepMind chair Demis Hassabis proposed this public-private partnership in July; OpenAI's Chris Lehane advocated for voluntary efforts to complement mandatory federal safeguards.
- Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei urged a slowdown in advanced models, a position supported by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Hassabis, amid escalating safety concerns and worker resignations.
- CEO Aiden Gomez accused dominant American AI labs of forming a "cartel" under the guise of safety, arguing the core dispute involves who writes rules.
- President Donald Trump has dismissed AI risk warnings as "hoaxes," while Huang noted at a Los Angeles conference that dire predictions about AI destroying humanity are "not grounded on science.
141 Articles
141 Articles
Obama (and Veltroni follows him) marries Amodei's alarmism and challenges Trump on the public regulation of computer brains. Claude's dad presents himself as a problem to offer the solution himself. The article Anthropic-dem axis to control who will control the digital revolution comes from The Truth.
The creation of a suitable body was proposed by the head of Google DeepMind Demis Hassabis.
The company created by Sam Altman revealed on Tuesday that the three companies have been working together for several weeks on security issues related to
AI Rivals Unite on Safety: OpenAI, Anthropic and Google Forge Quiet Alliance
OpenAI, Anthropic and Google DeepMind have coordinated on AI safety for weeks, confirming talks that began after Demis Hassabis's July proposal and Dario Amodei's recent call to slow frontier model development. Chris Lehane says no antitrust waiver is needed. The discussions could lead to a new industry standards body with independent oversight.
OpenAI, Anthropic and Google DeepMind are working on the creation of a supervisory body for artificial intelligence (AI) risks in response to calls to better control the drifts of this technology. The project is already criticized and threatened with a political blockage. These three major players of AI are calling for the establishment of a monitoring and monitoring body capable of saying no to the most dangerous projects.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 39% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium






































