He Shot a Fellow Patient in a Prague Hospital. The Hospital Is Innocent, the Courts Have Ruled
4 Articles
4 Articles
Did the hospital violate its obligations when it failed to discover that a hematology patient had a gun, which he then used to shoot another patient? This question was raised in court by the survivor of a shot patient, who argued that the hospital should pay for its misconduct. But the judiciary agreed that the hospital had not violated anything, and the verdict was upheld by the Supreme Court on Wednesday.
The Supreme Court has rejected the appeal of a man whose father was shot and fatally injured by another patient at the Královské Vinohrady University Hospital in Prague in 2019. In this case, the hospital is not liable for the non-pecuniary damage suffered by the survivor. The hospital could not have foreseen that the hospitalized person would attack other patients with a firearm, the ruling states.
The Supreme Court has rejected the appeal of a man whose father was shot and fatally injured by another patient at the Královské Vinohrady University Hospital in Prague in 2019. In this case, the hospital is not liable for the non-pecuniary damage suffered by the survivor. There is no causal connection between the actions of the medical staff and the patient's death. This follows from the judgment, which is temporarily made available on the offi…
Brno - The Supreme Court (NS) has rejected the appeal of a man whose father was shot and fatally injured by another patient at the Královské Vinohrady University Hospital in Prague in 2019. In this case, the hospital is not liable for the non-pecuniary damage of the survivor. There is no causal connection between the actions of the medical staff and the patient's death. The hospital could not have foreseen that the hospitalized person would atta…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 100% of the sources lean Left
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
