Netanyahu Says Any Future Palestinian State Would Be a Platform to Destroy Israel
- On July 7, 2025, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with President Donald Trump at the White House to discuss the ongoing conflict in Gaza and explore prospects for peace.
- The meeting occurred in the aftermath of a deadly assault launched by Hamas from Gaza in early October 2023, which resulted in approximately 1,200 deaths and the capture of 251 hostages, leading to the outbreak of the Gaza conflict and Israel’s military response.
- Netanyahu characterized the Hamas attack as an indication that a future Palestinian state could be used as a base to threaten Israel, emphasizing that Israel must retain full control over its security.
- Trump conveyed cautious hopefulness about the peace negotiations, indicating he believes an agreement could be reached soon, while deferring the question of a two-state solution to Netanyahu, who dismissed the idea.
- The talks in Doha between Israel and Hamas aim to secure a US-brokered ceasefire and hostage release, while Israel continues its offensive that has killed over 57,000 Palestinians in Gaza.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?
16 Articles
16 Articles
All
Left
4
Center
3
Right
4
Netanyahu says any future Palestinian state would be a platform to destroy Israel
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Monday he wanted peace with Palestinians but described any future independent state as a platform to destroy Israel and for that reason sovereign power of security must remain with Israel.
·United Kingdom
Read Full Article

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said he supports peace with the Palestinians, but that any future independent Palestinian state, in his opinion, represents a security threat and a platform for the destruction of Israel.
·Belgrade, Serbia
Read Full ArticleCoverage Details
Total News Sources16
Leaning Left4Leaning Right4Center3Last UpdatedBias Distribution36% Left, 36% Right
Bias Distribution
- 36% of the sources lean Left, 36% of the sources lean Right
36% Right
L 36%
C 27%
R 36%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium