North Carolina justices decide family can sue over unwanted COVID-19 shot
- The North Carolina Supreme Court ruled 5-2 that a family can sue for a COVID-19 vaccine administered to a minor without parental consent, overturning previous legal protections related to the federal Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act .
- Chief Justice Paul Newby stated that the vaccine administration violated constitutional rights, allowing for legal action against the school and medical clinic involved.
- Justice Allison Riggs dissented, arguing the majority's ruling misinterpreted federal law and criticized their constitutional analysis.
- Tanner Smith's family claims he received the vaccine despite his protests and lack of consent, leading to the lawsuit against health officials.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?
53 Articles
53 Articles
All
Left
9
Center
5
Right
23
Family Suing Over Teen's Unwanted Vaccination
A North Carolina mother's lawsuit regarding a dose of the COVID-19 vaccine that she says was given to her son without consent is moving forward. The state supreme court ruled Friday that the lawsuit against a public school board could proceed, the Washington Post reports. Emily Happel says the Guilford...
·Miami, United States
Read Full ArticleCoverage Details
Total News Sources53
Leaning Left9Leaning Right23Center5Last UpdatedBias Distribution62% Right
Bias Distribution
- 62% of the sources lean Right
62% Right
L 24%
14%
R 62%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage