US Edition
Motion to Compel Searching of Devices Denied Due to BYOD Policies
Summary by eDiscovery Today by Doug Austin
This story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.1 Articles
1 Articles
All
Left
Center
Right
Motion to Compel Searching of Devices Denied Due to BYOD Policies
In Allergan, Inc. v. Revance Therapeutics, Inc., Tennessee Special Master Todd Presnell stating that “the Special Master finds that Revance does not have Rule 34(a) control over the personal devices of employees”, denied Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Searching of Devices used under Revance's BYOD policies. The post Motion to Compel Searching of Devices Denied Due to BYOD Policies: eDiscovery Case Law appeared first on eDiscovery Today by Doug Aus…
Coverage Details
Total News Sources1
Leaning Left0Leaning Right0Center0Last UpdatedBias DistributionNo sources with tracked biases.
Bias Distribution
- There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage
