US Edition
Migrants, “the Cpr Do Not Respect Personal Freedom”: the Ruling of the Constitutional Court
9 Articles
9 Articles
The detention of people “is a physical subjection to other people's power.” The Consulta asks that Parliament fill the gap in the law
This has been established by the Consulta in a sentence, explaining that detention in the Centers for return involves a "physical subjection to the...
The Constitutional Court has expressed itself (judgment no. 96/2020), with a clear "monitor to the legislator" on the detention of foreigners in detention centres for return (Cpr). The questions of constitutional legitimacy had been raised by the Judge of Peace of Rome on Article 14, paragraph 2, of the Single Text on immigration, and have been declared inadmissible. However, the Court has recognized an actual "vulnus normative" (Cpr): the curre…
Judges: 'Detention does not respect personal freedom'. Viminal: we work on a rule (ANSA)
The judgment after the question had been raised by the judge of peace of Rome
"The law establishing residence centers for repatriation dates back to '98, that is to say to the law of Turkish Napolitano. Today's pronunciation of the Constitutional Court highlights therefore a deficiency dating back to time without questioning the legitimacy of the use of Cpr for the repatriation of irregular migrants. On the point the offices of the Viminale were already engaged in the drafting of a norm of primary rank." So sources of the…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 50% of the sources lean Left
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
