Russia’s Richest Man Faces One of the Most Expensive Divorces in History
The Court of Appeal ruled Mrs. Potanina can pursue a claim for half of her ex-husband's $20 billion fortune, potentially creating one of England's largest divorce settlements.
- On Thursday, the Court of Appeal allowed Natalia Potanina to pursue a multibillion-pound divorce claim against her ex-husband Vladimir Potanin in London.
- This decision comes after several years of litigation, beginning with Mr Justice Cohen’s 2019 dismissal of the case, which the Court of Appeal reversed in 2021, allowing the proceedings to move forward despite sanctions imposed on Potanin.
- Potanina seeks half of Potanin's shares in Norilsk Nickel, dividends since 2014, and a high-end Russian property, arguing she supported his rise during their 31-year marriage.
- The claim is valued around £5 billion , potentially becoming one of the world's largest divorces, while Potanin's fortune is estimated near $20 billion and he remains sanctioned for supporting the Kremlin.
- Potanina hopes the matter resolves without delay, with legal experts noting London’s status as a major divorce jurisdiction and that this decision encourages fair outcomes for wealthy spouses.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?
14 Articles
14 Articles

+2 Reposted by 2 other sources
Russia’s richest man faces one of the most expensive divorces in history
The long-running legal battle has pitted billionaire Vladimir Potanin against his ex-wife after a 31-year marriage. A key ruling has just gone against him.
·Sydney, Australia
Read Full ArticleRussia’s Richest Man Potanin Faces Divorce Claim After Losing Latest UK Appeal
Russia’s richest man Vladimir Potanin lost a legal fight with his ex-wife, clearing the way for her to pursue a claim for a multibillion dollar share of his mining assets in one of the world’s largest divorces.
·United States
Read Full ArticleCoverage Details
Total News Sources14
Leaning Left5Leaning Right1Center0Last UpdatedBias Distribution83% Left
Bias Distribution
- 83% of the sources lean Left
83% Left
L 83%
R 17%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium