Published • loading... • Updated
Angiography-Guided PCI Assessment Confers Similar Outcomes to FFR for Intermediate Lesions
The ALL-RISE trial showed CathWorks FFRangio matches invasive pressure wire for one-year major cardiac events with 6.9% event rate and shorter procedure time.
- On Sunday, March 29, 2026, researchers presented ALL-RISE Trial results at the American College of Cardiology Scientific Session in New Orleans, showing the CathWorks FFRangio system is non-inferior to invasive pressure wire guidance for evaluating coronary lesions.
- Historically, interventionists evaluated coronary lesions by 'eyeballing' severity or using invasive pressure wires, said Dr. Ajay Kirtane; the AI-assisted FFRangio System now provides physiologic information from routine angiograms without requiring invasive wires.
- The randomized trial enrolled 1,930 patients, reporting no significant difference in primary endpoint events at one year: 6.9% for the FFRangio group versus 7.1% for the pressure wire group.
- Use of the FFRangio model reduced total contrast volume and procedure time compared to guidewire use, while patients experienced no increased risk of bleeding or acute kidney injury.
- Dr. Anna Bortnick, chair-elect of the ACC Interventional Council, called the study a "glimpse of the future of the cath lab," while Medtronic executive Jason Weidman said the data affirm confidence in FFRangio as a new worldwide standard.
Insights by Ground AI
19 Articles
19 Articles
Angiography-guided PCI assessment confers similar outcomes to FFR for intermediate lesions
NEW ORLEANS — In patients with intermediate coronary lesions, an angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention strategy was noninferior to a pressure wire-guided PCI strategy for CV outcomes at 1 year, new data show. The ALL-RISE trial, presented at the American College of Cardiology Scientific Session and simultaneously published in The New England Journal of Medicine, showed that
Coverage Details
Total News Sources19
Leaning Left1Leaning Right0Center11Last UpdatedBias Distribution92% Center
Bias Distribution
- 92% of the sources are Center
92% Center
C 92%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium









