US Edition
South Africa: When AI Makes Mistakes in the Courtroom
KERALA, INDIA, JUL 22 – Kerala High Court mandates lawyers and judges to verify AI content, prohibit evidence fabrication, and log AI use in proceedings to ensure transparency and accountability.
7 Articles
7 Articles
The Cologne District Court is taking a lawyer to task for allegedly generating AI-generated and error-ridden pleadings. In fact, the judge isn't even above ordering the lawyer to cease and desist and threatening to join the bar association. The family court judge identified numerous errors in the lawyer's pleadings. Therefore, he included the following in a ruling: The attorney must refrain from making such statements in the future, as they comp…
An expert states that it is "afraidly probable" that many American courts do not take account of AI errors judges are overwhelmed by false cases hallucinated by the IAThe introduction of AI in the courts marks a major evolution in the functioning of justice. Judges and lawyers are increasingly relying on AI, which raises many concerns. One expert stated that it is "afraidly probable" that many American courts will have to deal with the problem.
What is the Kerala HC’s new AI policy all about? And what more is needed?
The new AI policy is rigorous, codifying AI’s use as an assisting tool in our courtrooms. But how far can India’s courts go without robust digital infrastructure, judicial education, and focussed investments by the Supreme Court and BCI?
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 100% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
