Skip to main content
institutional access

You are connecting from
Lake Geneva Public Library,
please login or register to take advantage of your institution's Ground News Plan.

Published loading...Updated

South Dakota Supreme Court rules officer names can be kept secret

The 5-0 ruling says names or initials can expose officers to harassment, overturning a lower court decision in a case tied to Samir Albaidhani.

  • On Thursday, the South Dakota Supreme Court ruled 5-0 that officers involved in shootings can shield their names under Marsy's Law, reversing a lower court decision that denied redaction.
  • The case stems from an April 3, 2024, shootout involving Samir Albaidhani, who fired on two Sioux Falls police officers who requested name redaction to prevent potential harassment.
  • Interpreting Marsy's Law, the court classified officers as victims, stating, "A law enforcement officer is a 'person'" entitled to protection against intimidation or harassment as any other crime victim.
  • The case will return to the circuit court "for further proceedings consistent with this opinion," as the Supreme Court overruled the previous judge who argued officers in official capacities cannot be victims.
  • Legal precedents differ across the U.S., with the Ohio State Supreme Court similarly shielding officer identities while Florida's high court has ruled that constitutional provisions do not permit officers to conceal their names.
Insights by Ground AI

11 Articles

Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • 67% of the sources are Center
67% Center

Factuality Info Icon

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

Info Icon

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

KELO broke the news in Sioux Falls, United States on Thursday, April 23, 2026.
Too Big Arrow Icon
Sources are mostly out of (0)

Similar News Topics

News
Feed Dots Icon
For You
Search Icon
Search
Blindspot LogoBlindspotLocal