Jackson rebukes Thomas over his birthright citizenship dissent
The 6-3 ruling says children born on U.S. soil remain citizens, and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson called the administration’s theory ahistorical.
- On Tuesday, the Supreme Court rejected President Donald Trump's effort to limit birthright citizenship in a 6-3 ruling, upholding the 14th Amendment's guarantee for children born to parents unlawfully or temporarily in the U.S.
- Trump's executive order last year instructed federal agencies to deny citizenship to babies born to non-citizens, prompting lawsuits from expectant parents, immigrant rights groups, and 22 state attorneys general challenging the policy.
- Justice Clarence Thomas argued in his dissent that the 14th Amendment was designed for freed slaves, while Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson countered it established a "universalist" vision extending to all born on American soil.
- Jackson accused Thomas of echoing the "detestable" 1857 Dred Scott decision, asserting the administration and Thomas were "wrong" to argue the amendment was repurposed for political projects unintended by Congress.
- Reacting to the decision, Trump called it "bad for our Country," while more than 30 countries including Canada, Mexico, and Brazil maintain automatic birthright citizenship policies.
32 Articles
32 Articles
Two-hundred-and-fifty years in, Justice Jackson is doing the work that is needed from our leaders
On this Fourth of July, I am thinking about how important it is for the United States that we have leaders willing to speak forthrightly about our past and ambitiously about our future in order to make it through the treacherous present. On June 30, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson did both, illustrating perfectly what is needed from our leaders.ShareIn the birthright citizenship case, as I covered earlier this week, Jackson did the work that was n…
Universal Human Equality Does Not Require Universal Citizenship › American Greatness
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s concurrence in the Supreme Court’s birthright citizenship decision, Trump v. Barbara, contains one of the most revealing passages ever written about […] Source
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 44% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium























