Judges Reported Harassment of the Disciplinary Tribunal
This story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.2 Articles
2 Articles
Almost a year after the formal establishment of the Judicial Disciplinary Tribunal, more than 40 cases have been recorded of persons facing administrative responsibility procedures and provisional suspensions of office, which, moreover, mostly belong to the judicial career. Conceived under the banner of eradicating opacity and nepotism, human rights defenders and organizations of judges warned that the institution is being used as a political ar…
Less than a year after the formal establishment of the Court of Judicial Discipline, a body conceived under the banner of eradicating opacity and nepotism, human rights defenders and organizations of judges warned that the institution is being used as a political arm to pursue the judicial criterion; so far, more than 40 cases of persons facing administrative responsibility procedures and provisional suspensions of office, most of whom also belo…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
