Published • loading... • Updated
Another judicial panel rejects challenge to Wisconsin congressional map
The panel said the claims were non-justiciable under Wisconsin law, leaving the state’s 6-2 congressional split in place.
- A three-judge panel on Tuesday dismissed a second lawsuit challenging Wisconsin's congressional maps, ruling the issue of competitive redistricting is a political question beyond the court's authority.
- Wisconsin Business Leaders for Democracy filed the lawsuit, arguing the state's 2022 congressional map constitutes unconstitutional 'anticompetitive gerrymandering' that shields incumbents from electoral competition.
- Citing a 2022 Wisconsin Supreme Court precedent, the panel asserted the state constitution 'contains no grant of authority' to regulate map competitiveness, rendering plaintiffs' claims non-justiciable.
- Law Forward, the firm representing the plaintiffs, plans to appeal to the state Supreme Court, though a ruling before this November's midterm elections remains uncertain.
- Democratic gubernatorial candidate Mandela Barnes criticized the maps as unfair, while the current congressional map sends six Republicans and two Democrats to Washington.
Insights by Ground AI
16 Articles
16 Articles
Second judicial panel rejects challenge to Wisconsin congressional map
A three-judge panel has rejected another lawsuit attempting to throw out Wisconsin's congressional map. The post Second judicial panel rejects challenge to Wisconsin congressional map appeared first on WPR.
·Madison, United States
Read Full Article+2 Reposted by 2 other sources
Lawsuit challenging Wisconsin congressional maps dismissed by three judge panel
A lawsuit seeking to throw out Wisconsin’s congressional maps on the basis that they’re unconstitutionally anti-competitive was dismissed Tuesday by a panel of three circuit court judges. The lawsuit was brought last summer by bipartisan business group Wisconsin Business Leaders…
Coverage Details
Total News Sources16
Leaning Left4Leaning Right2Center10Last UpdatedBias Distribution63% Center
Bias Distribution
- 63% of the sources are Center
63% Center
L 25%
C 63%
12%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium










