MI5 false evidence was a serious failing, Cooper says
- In London on Wednesday, High Court judges ordered a 'robust and independent' investigation into MI5 after rejecting two previous inquiries as seriously deficient.
- Following BBC revelations, two official inquiries into MI5's false evidence were found to have serious procedural flaws and omitted key facts, leading to rejection by the High Court.
- Recorded BBC evidence and court findings revealed MI5 provided false information, prompting judges to conclude new evidence painted a significantly different picture from earlier inquiries.
- Following the court ruling, the government backs a thorough investigation overseen by Sir Brian Leveson, with the Attorney General reviewing MI5 evidence procedures, to restore oversight integrity.
- Beyond this case, oversight experts warn that trust in MI5 remains fragile, emphasizing the need for reforms and transparency to prevent future failures and restore public confidence.
13 Articles
13 Articles
U.K. High Court slams MI5 over informant deception and lack of transparency
A ruling by London's High Court cited the domestic intelligence agency's failure to explain why representatives had repeatedly misled U.K. courts about an informant accused of violence against women.
U.K. High Court Slams MI5 Over Informant Deception, Lack Of Transparency : NPR - Data Intelligence
The entrance to the headquarters of MI5, Britain’s domestic intelligence agency, in London. LH Images/Alamy hide caption toggle caption LH Images/Alamy LONDON — A High Court ruling in London Wednesday has cast a critical spotlight on Britain’s MI5 domestic intelligence agency. A ruling by a three-judge panel at London’s High Court cited the agency’s failure to adequately explain why representatives had repeatedly misled U.K. courts about an info…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 50% of the sources lean Left
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium