US Edition
Judge Hears Challenge to State’s Deceptive Ballot Language on Measure
Summary by ACLU of Missouri
This story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.1 Articles
1 Articles
Judge Hears Challenge to State’s Deceptive Ballot Language on Measure
Jefferson City, Mo. - The ACLU of Missouri and Stinson LLP presented arguments in a lawsuit charging the Secretary of State’s certified ballot language for HJR 73, now Amendment 3, as unfair and inaccurate. Additionally, the challenge asserts that the General Assembly failed in their duty to limit the proposed constitutional amendment to the single subject of “reproductive health care” by logrolling an arbitrary judicial process restricts the to…
Coverage Details
Total News Sources1
Leaning Left0Leaning Right0Center0Last UpdatedBias DistributionNo sources with tracked biases.
Bias Distribution
- There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
