US EditionFederal judge temporarily blocks Trump’s executive order targeting Jenner & Block
- A federal judge temporarily blocked Donald Trump's executive order against the law firm Jenner & Block, stating it likely violates multiple amendments, including the First, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments.
- Jenner & Block argued that Trump's order was unconstitutional and aimed at intimidating lawyers who oppose the administration.
- The judge found that Trump's order likely violates the First, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments, noting the potential chilling effect on the legal profession's duties.
- Legal expert Adam Klasfeld reported that the judge described Trump's executive order as 'disturbing' and 'troubling,' especially regarding its attack on pro bono practice.
44 Articles
44 Articles
Two Biglaw Paths Diverge In The Woods - See Also - Above the Law
Fallout From Skadden's Capitulation: A principled "I QUIT" from an associate. Suddenly Skadden Associates Can't Send Out Mass Emails: Not suspicious at all... Jenner & Block and WilmerHale Get Court Victories Against Trump: From a pair of GOP-appointed federal judges. Speaking Of Conservative Judges And Principled Stands: Maybe stop calling for impeachment when judges are just doing their jobs is a good idea. Trump Admin Big Mad Over Due Process:
Judges Partially Block Trump Orders Revoking Security Clearances of Law Firms
Two judges on March 28 blocked parts of President Donald Trump’s executive orders that directed the revocation of security clearances of two law firms. U.S. District Judge John Bates blocked portions of Trump’s order targeting Jenner & Block that sought to cancel federal contracts held by the firm’s clients and to restrict its lawyers’ access to federal buildings and officials. Bates also said Trump’s order appeared to bar lawyers at the firm fr…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 56% of the sources are Center
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage
