Jeffrey Goldberg: Leavitt 'playing at some sort of weird semantic game'
- Jeffrey Goldberg discussed information from Trump administration officials on Morning Joe, implicating Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth in sharing classified operational details.
- Karoline Leavitt criticized Goldberg's report, claiming it was sensationalist, while The Atlantic clarified the details were not 'war plans.'
- Goldberg rebutted Leavitt on Morning Joe, highlighting that the operational details included attack plans against terrorists.
- Leavitt has faced backlash for her rhetoric, indicating ongoing tensions between the White House and media over leaked information.
28 Articles
28 Articles
The Frontline Interview: Jeffrey Goldberg

'Nonsense': Atlantic editor-in-chief blasts Trump administration 'smokescreens' on Signal chat
ABC News (WASHINGTON) — The Atlantic Editor-in-Chief Jeffrey Goldberg responded to the Trump administration’s pushback over the publication’s Monday article about a Signal chat discussing a U.S. attack on Houthis in Yemen it says was accidentally shared with Goldberg. Speaking to ABC News, Goldberg said The White House is engaging in a semantic game by focusing on his use of “attack plans” instead of “war plans” in his followup report, which was…
Inside Job? How The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg May Have Infiltrated Trump’s Security Chat
The unexpected presence of Jeffrey Goldberg in a Trump security chat raises critical questions about intent and accountability. ve into the implications of this potential infiltration and its impact on national security.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 38% of the sources are Center
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage