A panel of judges in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit heard oral arguments from representatives of Kalshi and the states of Ohio and Tennessee on Thursday after split decisions in federal courts about whether the company should be allowed to offer sports prediction markets in the states. No decision was made, but counsel for both Kalshi and the states laid out their rationale in one of the most significant battlegrounds in the fed…
This story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.